Olympus 35RC and Kodak Gold 200
I love misspellings on Ebay. Olmpus = cheap camera!
I was very excited to get an Olympus 35RC rangefinder last week. This is a little gem of a camera that is all metal, doesn't need batteries to work (except for the auto exposure meter, if needed), and a fantastic 42mm f2.8 lens that produces outstanding pictures. When I unpacked it, it was very dirty. In fact the rangefinder spot was dark because the window was full of dirt. I spent a few hours cleaning it up and it looked great, but it seems the aperture is a little sticky. It is two sticky for the auto exposure to work. The 35RC adjusts the auto exposure by opening and closing the diaphragm to match the shutter speed chosen. I brought it to the local camera shop for a internal cleaning and lube, but the wussies wouldn't touch it. Curse you Darkroom. Well, I wanted to make sure that everything else worked, so I went and bought the cheapest C41 film available, Kodak Gold, and ran a 24 exposure roll through the camera.
I had to guess at exposures since I don't own a meter and didn't feel like carrying my Canon around to cheat. So I just jotted down some notes from the googlesphere about cloudy day exposures and then bracketed +/- 1 stop. It was a really crappy day for photography, but I do enjoy hiking around in the woods and up and down the river.
![]() |
Bitterroot Auto Lot. These tractors are all available to a good home. I would have liked to get closer, but the big barbed wire fence was a deterrent. |
I couldn't be happier with the results. First of all, what a fun little camera to shoot with. It is heavier than one might expect for it's tiny size, but the thing is built like a tank. It is very easy to focus and compose. The rangefinder is bright and apparently accurate. All but a couple of the photos are tack sharp, and I'm sure the ones that aren't were because of user error.
![]() |
Fence Post and Barbed Wire. A little cliche, but whatevs. Very first photo with the camera, and I forgot to bracket the exposure, so I am glad I guessed right. |
The color on the prints is pretty amazing. Kodak Gold is not known for super saturated and artistic images, but I think these look great. The lens on the 35RC is multicoated for good color transmission and contrast, which I think really shows since shooting conditions were dull and low contrast.
Also, I think I should mention that COSTCO did an amazing job. Their scanning software must do an auto exposure correction and Kodak Gold must have great latitude because I cannot tell the difference between the three exposures on the shots I bracketed. I am impressed. The film cost 2.99 and the developing and scan to CD cost 4.58. The Darkroom has gotten my last roll of film.
![]() |
Red Twig Dogwood and Pines. Very tough scene with bright whites and very dark shadows. Sharpness and detail really shine in this photo. |
Also, I think I should mention that COSTCO did an amazing job. Their scanning software must do an auto exposure correction and Kodak Gold must have great latitude because I cannot tell the difference between the three exposures on the shots I bracketed. I am impressed. The film cost 2.99 and the developing and scan to CD cost 4.58. The Darkroom has gotten my last roll of film.
I can't break myself away from digital yet, but you inspired me to try a rangefinder. A friend let me borrow his Fuji X100. Very cool, classic looking camera that produces photos that (shocker) look just like what I saw. Fixed lens and heavy are probably deal-breakers for me getting my own, but perfectly exposed and saturated photos are hard to ignore.
ReplyDeleteAre you going to do a really wide angle on that old truck for the HDR?